02580nM2.01200024      h001 BV050218273\x1e002a20250326\x1e003 20250402\x1e004 20250403\x1e0
20 9781003300267\xb6ZDB-7-TFC\x1e026 BVBBV050218273\x1e030 z|1dr||||||17\x1e037beng\x1e050 ||||
||||g|||||\x1e051 m|||||||\x1e060 \x1faText\x1fbtxt\x1e061 \x1faComputermedien\x1fbc\x1e062 \x1faOnline-Res
source\x1fbcr\x1e070aOCoLC-P\x1e070bDE-12\x1e076 RDA-Aufnahme\x1e078eZDB-7-TFC\x1e080 03\x1e100 Gon\xd0c
alves, Bernardo\x1e331 \x88The\x89 Turing test argument\x1e359 Bernardo Goncalves\x1e419 \x1faNew 
York, NY\x1fbRoutledge\x1fc2024\x1e419d\x1fc\xad2024\x1e425a2024\x1e433 1 Online-Ressource (xii, 225 
Seiten)\x1e451bRoutledge studies in twentieth-century philosophy\x1e501 OCLC-licensed 
vendor bibliographic record\x1e540aISBN 978-1-003-30026-7\x1e540aISBN 1-003-30026-X\x1e54
0aISBN 978-1-003-82942-3\x1e540aISBN 1-003-82942-2\x1e540aISBN 978-1-003-82945-4\x1e540aI
SBN 1-003-82945-7\x1e552a10.4324/9781003300267\x1e655e\x1fuhttps://doi.org/10.4324/978100
3300267\x1fxVerlag\x1fzURL des Erstver\xc9offentlichers\x1f3Volltext\x1e656e\x1fuhttps://doi.org/1
0.4324/9781003300267\x1flUEI01\x1fpZDB-7-TFC\x1fqUEI_PDA_TFC2_Kauf\x1fxVerlag\x1f3Volltext\x1e705a
\x1fa006.3\x1feDDC23/eng/20231012eng\x1e711a\x1faPHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / General\x1fxb
isacsh\x1e711a\x1faCOMPUTERS / Artificial Intelligence\x1fxbisacsh\x1e740p\xb6aTuring, Alan / 1
912-1954\x1e740s\xb6aTuring test / History\x1e750 "This book departs from existing accoun
ts of Turing's imitation game and test by placing Turing's proposal in its histo
rical, social, and cultural context. It reconstructs a controversy in England, 1
946-1952, over the cognitive capabilities of digital computers, which led Turing
 to propose his test. It argues that the Turing test is best understood not as a
 practical experiment, but as a thought experiment in the modern scientific trad
ition of Galileo. The logic of the Turing test argument is reconstructed from th
e rhetoric of Turing's irony and wit. Turing believed that learning machines sho
uld be understood as a new kind of species, and their thinking as different from
 human thinking and yet capable of imitating it. He thought that the possibiliti
es of the machines he envisioned were not utopian dreams. And yet he hoped that 
they would rival and surpass chauvinists and intellectuals who sacrifice indepen
dent thinking to maintain their power. These would be transformed into ordinary 
people, as work once considered 'intellectual' would be transformed into noninte
llectual, 'mechanical' work. The Turing Test Argument will appeal to scholars an
d students in the sciences and humanities, and all those interested in Turing's 
vision of the future of intelligent machines in society"--\x1e776 \x1fiErscheint auch 
als\x1fnDruck-Ausgabe\x1fz9781032291574\x1e776 \x1fiErscheint auch als\x1fnDruck-Ausgabe\x1fz97810
32291581\x1eLOWaUEI01\x1e\x1d