04824nM2.01200024      h001 BV050651975\x1e002a20260320\x1e004 20260321\x1e026 BVBBV05065
1975\x1e030 a|||r||||||37\x1e037beng\x1e050 a|||||||||||||\x1e051 sb||||||\x1e060 \x1faText\x1fbtxt\x1e0
61 \x1faohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen\x1fbn\x1e062 \x1faBand\x1fbnc\x1e070 DE-29\x1e076 RDA-Aufnahme\x1e0
80 05\x1e100bMurata, Daniel Peixoto\x1e104bRodriguez-Blanco, Veronica\x1e108bRabanos, Jul
ieta A\x1e112bKutz, Christopher\x1e200bBloomsbury (Firm) / publisher\x1e331 Bernard Willi
ams on law and jurisprudence\x1e335 from agency and responsibility to methodology\x1e3
59 edited by Daniel Peixoto Murata, Julieta A. Rabanos and Veronica Rodriguez-Bl
anco\x1e419 \x1faOxford\x1fbHart Publishing, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc\x1fc2026\x1e425a2026\x1e433
 xii, 315 pages\x1e435 24 cm\x1e451 Law and practical reason ; 18\x1e455 volume 18\x1e456 18
\x1e521 \x1faIntroduction: Bernard Williams as a Legal Philosopher / Daniel Peixoto Mu
rata (University of Sao Paulo, Brazil), Julieta A Rabanos (University of Belgrad
e, Serbia), and Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco (University of Surrey, UK) -- Part I: 
Responsibility, Regret, and the Law. 1. 'The idea of the voluntary is essentiall
y superficial': Bernard Williams on Responsibility and Political Freedom / Ulrik
e Heuer (University College London, UK) -- 2. The Politics of Civic Maturity v t
he Politics of Justice: Reflecting on Bernard Williams' Separation Thesis / Vero
nica Rodriguez-Blanco (University of Surrey, UK) -- 3. Internal Reasons, Motivat
ion, and the Proleptic Nature of Blame / Gerard Lang (University of Leeds, UK) -
- 4. Taking the Edge off Professional Ethical Dilemmas / Emmanuel Voyiakis (LSE 
Law School, UK) -- 5. Response-Norm Concepts in Law and Morality: A Qualified De
fence of Moral Luck / Benjamin C Zipursky (Fordham Law School, USA) --^\x1e521 \x1fa6.
 Thinking about Shame and Necessity in Liberal Constitutional Theory / Emily Kid
d White (Osgoode Hall Law School, Canada) -- 7. Political Realism, Tragedy, and 
the Violent Foundations of the State. Reading The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance w
ith Bernard Williams / David Owen (University of Southampton, UK) -- Part II: Wi
lliams on the Methodology of Philosophy and Jurisprudence. 8. Creon's Revenge: L
awfulness and the Genealogy of Law / Stephen Bero (University of Texas, USA) -- 
9. Law and Lawfulness: Genealogy, Jurisprudence and the Thought of Bernard Willi
ams / Christopher Tollefsen (University of South Carolina, USA) -- 10. The Idea 
of Humanistic Middle-Range Theory / Damian Cueni (University of St. Gallen, Swit
zerland) -- 11. Why Can't Law be More like Morality? / Christopher Kutz (U.C. Be
rkeley, USA) -- 12. An Unusual but Successful Philosophical Marriage in Bernard 
Williams: Nietzsche and Wittgenstein / Ronaldo Porto Macedo Jr (University of Sa
o Paulo Law School, Brazil) --^\x1e521 \x1fa13. Law as a Test of Conceptual Strength /
 Matthieu Queloz (University of Bern, Switzerland) -- 14. Practical Reasoning as
 Interpretation: Williamsian Remarks on Dworkin's Methodology / Daniel Peixoto M
urata (University of Sao Paulo, Brazil) -- 15. A Williamsian Account of Jurispru
dence as Conceptual Morphology / Miodrag Jovanovi\xc2c, Bojan Spai\xc2c (University of
 Belgrade, Serbia)\x1e540aISBN 1509976132\x1e540aISBN 9781509976133\x1e710cWilliams, Bern
ard / 1929-2003\x1e710aLaw / Philosophy\x1e710aResponsibility\x1e710aPolitical science / 
Philosophy\x1e750bThis book is the first collection of essays on Bernard Williams' 
moral and political philosophy to shed light on the nature of law, and key legal
 concepts. By the time of his death in 2003, Williams was widely regarded as the
 most important moral philosopher of his generation. Surprisingly, his work is s
till largely under-discussed in legal theory. This book aims to fill this gap wi
th brand new discussions from scholars both from law and philosophy. The first p
art of the book focuses on Williams' work on responsibility and regret and its i
mplications for law. Drawing from Ancient Greek authors, Williams maintained tha
t luck might play a key role in our practices of responsibility and that some di
mensions of responsibility are tied to the notion of having a character. What we
 do - intentionally or not - might affect our understanding of ourselves and of 
our place in the world. How do those ideas help us in making sense of legal resp
onsibility? How broader concerns about our practices of responsibility impact th
e law? Those are some of the questions addressed by the authors in this part. Th
e second part looks at how Williams' understanding of philosophy can shape the w
ay we do jurisprudence. Williams' work on the methodology of philosophy combines
 resources from analytical philosophy, continental authors, history, and literat
ure. He understood philosophy as a humanistic discipline. The authors in the sec
ond part of the book draw from Williams' work, notably his innovative take on th
e genealogical method, to discuss how we could practice legal philosophy in this
 same spirit\x1eLOWaUER01\x1e\x1d